NBC News, I have to take you seriously, only because I see no Gifs, emogi and stuff on your article. That you chose to make this about Sen. Elizabeth Warren instead of the insulting bully, Donald Trump, the most insipid person to ever occupy this nation’s highest office, says much about you.
I saw the rally and heard Trump insult Senator Warren and her mother, among others. I saw and heard his audience’s raucous approval. They who sat unperturbed as their president used debasing language about others. Trump has no respect for his office, himself or another.
Now comes your article, making light of Trump’s public diatribe as to how Senator Warren might prove her ethnicity ….to his satisfaction. Trump’s crowd found that acceptable. That doesn’t mean that you should speculate about it. You asked whether she could prove her ancestry. You ignored Trump’s history of demanding President Obama prove his citizenship. Can’t you see the pattern? Can’t you put his attack in context -his talk about Senator Warren’s DNA; demanding immigration detainees prove to his government via DNA, that the children the US government unlawfully took from detainees’s custody are their’s? Are you that afraid of Donald Trump?
I am aware of Trump’s racist motivations that is shared by Jeff Sessions and ICE. Why would you associate yourself, even distantly with such odiousness?
bluegadfly.com The one who feeds you, controls you.
True today as it’s always been.
I do understand that the players have to make a living and that they have contracts to honour. I just wonder, sometimes about the attorneys who represent them at the signing of these contracts and whether they know what rights given away?
But, let’s look at the fans. The fans who are enthralled with this or that player or team; the hundreds of thousands of people who make a living off the earnings of the athletes and the benefits to cities and the nation though tax revenues and so much more. All because of the players -not the owners.
I guess fans associate with the athlete, the image, not the man. Nope! Never with the Black human form.
Now, for those co-opted, who are wilfully confused; those who pretend not to have to decide: it’s about police brutality, police impunity to murder Black people in America and a criminal justice industry focused on our destruction through stultification.
If there is any doubt in your heart, two nights ago Trump, who has been on a dehumanising rant, finally spoke what’s in his malevolent, tiny, undeveloped mind. He said that if they won’t stand proudly for the national anthem, then they must get ouof the America. It can’t get clearer than that.
Well, Donald, piss on yourself, because we aren’t going anywhere. Even if Ben Carson, Mia Love, Kanye and others say pretty please.
We are here! We are aware! We are resolute!
Today it’s Starbucks’ turn for caustic opprobrium. It’s their turn to be piñata of the day, because there were more decent customers than others, in the coffeehouse, and a woman was adroit enough to use the most feared weapon in America -a cellphone.
I’m not worried about the two Black men victimized. They are smart and doing well enough to take legal action to redress the wrong. Nor is there any sympathy needed for the Black police chief, who made himself so powerless that I don’t want to imagine the compromised, sectional existence that must be his. So all is well until tomorrow, when the world sees another America within a minute of the electronic upload. Worst if streaming. To come are the rest of the stories and American children are all watching and learning.
If this reads as uncaring, that’s not my intention. This is more about how I cope with institutionalized racism that pervades all life in America, and don’t ever think that the perpetrators and enablers are always White. I know that because of many experiences.
Starbucks would have us believe that firing a member of its staff and sensitivity training are good enough….to get by. Well, Mr. Starbucks, visit any of your stores and let us know if you see what your brand projects. Look the thing that you hatched, in the eyes. It’s not pretty and it’s menacing.
Your corporate culture is who you are. Your staff don’t need sensitivity training, they need leadership and good examples worthy of emulation. Just as nothing happens until something moves, people do what they believe is expected of them. They want to please you and maybe get recognition.
They are probably stunned by the swiftness of what corporate America and many governmental agencies rely on. Go to the most junior employee, publicly fire them and some people are satisfied. The latest script is, “that is not who we are.” I differ.
So my personal philosophy in coping with victimization is this: first, who needs whom; second, is the commodity essential to my comfort, and third, is it be available elsewhere? What cannot be changed from within can be changed from without. Starbucks needs me. I don’t need Starbucks. Problem solved.
Lastly, the employee fired and those remaining have learned something and that something would likely be taken to the next jobs. How, Mr. Starbucks, have you helped?